The location was removed. The witnesses were not named. But the object-fast, low-flying, and seen by multiple observers-was real enough for the CIA to file a report.

In this one-page intelligence brief, titled simply "Observation of Flying Object Near [Deleted]," the Agency recorded a sighting that occurred during calm weather, involving both a government official and a military observer, who gave consistent accounts.

"It moved at great speed and disappeared within seconds."

🧭 Why the Location Was Redacted

The report doesn’t say where the sighting occurred. Instead, it refers only to "a location in the [REDACTED] region."

The most likely reasons for this include:

  • The proximity to a sensitive military installation or test site

  • The possibility that the object was observed over foreign airspace

  • A deliberate attempt to separate the event from other regional sightings

The fact that the location was stripped suggests the Agency saw continued operational sensitivity, long after the event itself.

👁️ What Witnesses Reported

The object was described as:

  • Traveling at high speed

  • Emitting no sound

  • Flying without visible wings or propulsion

  • Disappearing rapidly beyond the horizon

It was seen in daylight, and the report emphasizes the calm atmospheric conditions, ruling out weather interference.

"It made no sound and left no trail."

🔍 Why the CIA Archived It

This wasn’t a public report or a newspaper clipping. It was collected and stored by intelligence officers-suggesting that, even if no immediate action was taken, the Agency saw value in building a record of credible, unexplained aerial encounters.

  • Multiple witnesses

  • Favorable visibility conditions

  • Official acknowledgment of the sighting

  • No attempt to explain it away

ALSO READ:  The CIA’s Gateway Process: How the US Tried to Engineer Out-of-Body States

The incident may be minor compared to more famous UFO encounters, but it fits a pattern seen repeatedly across declassified Cold War files: quiet documentation, no resolution.

Original source