A newly leaked, 141-page internal report from Bigelow Aerospace Advanced Space Studies (BAASS) reveals the most comprehensive technical assessment of the now-infamous 2004 USS Nimitz UAP encounter to date.
Created during the Defense Intelligence Agency’s secretive AATIP era, the report was never meant for public release.
Unlike the sanitized summaries previously shared with Congress or the public, this internal report goes far beyond eyewitness testimony.
It maps radar returns, proposes propulsion models, and candidly discusses the potential for non-human intelligence-all while downplaying its more sensational implications with clinical technical language.
Yet it also leaves out key information, avoids definitive conclusions, and seems built to impress military brass rather than fully inform them.
“The current understanding of propulsion cannot account for the observed performance characteristics.”
This isn’t a press release. It’s a private sector intelligence product prepared for a defense contractor operating in a legal gray zone-one where classified knowledge, speculation, and narrative management meet.
📍 The Nimitz Event Reconstructed
The core of the document is a multi-chapter reconstruction of the 2004 Nimitz Carrier Strike Group encounter off the coast of California.
The report includes:
-
A full breakdown of the SPY-1 radar anomalies observed by the USS Princeton
-
Detailed pilot testimonies from Commander David Fravor and others
-
Reference to fast-movers descending from 80,000 feet to sea level in seconds
-
Infrared imagery analysis from the FLIR pod of the F/A-18 Super Hornets
The object’s performance is repeatedly described as defying inertia and known aerodynamic limitations.
Accelerations are estimated in excess of 700g, and no thermal exhaust or wings were ever observed.
“If these observations are accurate, the physics of our known world must be reconsidered.”
Still, the language remains careful. Observations are called “anomalous,” not alien. The technology is labeled “exotic,” but never attributed.
🧪 Technical Models and Speculation
Unlike public reports, this document delves into possible explanations, drawing on speculative propulsion concepts:
-
Warp drives and spacetime manipulation
-
Inertial mass reduction
-
Gravitational lensing or field propulsion
-
Electrogravitics and plasma envelopes
These are framed in scientific language, with citations from fringe physics papers and even diagrams showing hypothetical mechanisms.
Notably, no working theory is confirmed, but multiple ones are explored as “hypothetically consistent” with the observed behavior.
“There is no known terrestrial explanation for the performance characteristics witnessed.”
This is BAASS hedging its bets. It shows the Pentagon it’s exploring all angles, without staking itself to any particular worldview.
🧠 Human Effects and Sensor Interference
A lesser-known section of the report details anomalous physiological effects and sensor disruptions reportedly associated with UAP encounters:
-
Cognitive fog in pilots post-encounter
-
Electromagnetic interference on aircraft systems
-
Transient radar invisibility
These effects echo themes found in other BAASS work, especially those derived from Skinwalker Ranch investigations, where UAPs were linked to neurological symptoms and radiation exposure.
Though mentioned, these elements are downplayed.
No long-term studies or follow-up investigations are referenced.
🧾 Who This Report Was Really For
BAASS didn’t write this for scientists or journalists. It was clearly compiled for:
-
Military acquisition officers
-
Intelligence analysts
-
Funding decision-makers
The document is structured to validate the seriousness of the UAP issue while framing BAASS as a capable intelligence operator. It’s part science, part sales pitch.
It references the work of other AATIP figures (like Hal Puthoff and Eric Davis) without naming them directly, and continuously suggests that more funding and access to classified sensor data is needed to reach any definitive conclusions.
🧩 What’s Missing?
Despite its length and tone, the report noticeably avoids or omits:
-
Any discussion of retrieved materials
-
Mention of crash recovery programs
-
References to the Wilson Memo, reverse engineering, or exotic artifacts
-
Direct statements linking UAPs to extraterrestrial intelligence
In doing so, it feels intentionally incomplete-an expertly crafted middle-ground document: speculative enough to impress, vague enough to deny.
🕵️ A Controlled Leak?
Its sudden appearance, weeks after a whistleblower resurfaced warning about “voice-to-skull” technology and suppressed anti-gravity labs, raises eyebrows.
Was this report leaked to distract from deeper secrets inside BAASS?
The leaker behind previous BAASS documents thinks so, claiming this sanitized report is a “controlled release” intended to draw attention away from illegal surveillance, black-budget research, and unethical programs hidden within the same infrastructure.
🔚 The Takeaway
The full Tic Tac report is real, dense, and deeply revealing-not necessarily about aliens, but about how the U.S. defense apparatus handles the unknown.
It shows:
-
A sincere effort to quantify impossible data
-
A careful dance between science and national security
-
A PR operation running in the background of serious research
This is disclosure, but it’s strategic disclosure-a breadcrumb trail, not a confession.
